![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() ![]() |
||
Inside the Latest issue of Dental Asia
Facts and fiction about chewing gum Kati Leskinen takes a critical look at how the consumption of chewing gum may - or may not - benefit oral health. Chewing gum consumption in Asia is at its highest and is expected to rise further in the coming years. A strong focus on oral health has also contributed to gum's appeal, and consumers are increasingly turning to sugar-free chewing gum. In China, for example, the sugar-free chewing gum market experienced a phenomenal growth of 146% in 2005 over the previous year. However, with an average 20 servings of chewing gum annually, the Chinese are still far behind their Taiwanese, Korean or Japanese neighbours who consume approximately 100 chewing gums a year. While sugar-free chewing gum is generally recognized as beneficial for oral health, some gum manufacturers have recently begun to make distinct health claims suggesting that certain gum brands would have remineralising or whitening effects. Consequently, consumers erroneously believe that sugar-free chewing gum can - at least partly - replace the daily tooth brushing practice. The aim of this article is to take a critical look on what chewing gum can - and cannot - do in terms of oral health.
Orthodontic tooth movement of a central incisor across the midline has been reported in a few cases. 1-8 The reason for moving an incisor across the midline might either to be avoided or eliminated the need for prosthetic rehabilitation. The suture seems to complicate the tooth movement when moving a maxillary central incisor across the midline in a young individual. The experience is that such a tooth will relapse a lot more than teeth moved in other areas of the jaw. And the suture seems to be dislocated in front of the tooth moved. 1-6, 9 In this article, a case is presented to demonstrate movement of the maxillary right central incisor across the midline. Is formocresol still safe to use in paediatric dentistry? (Part II)
Formocresol, when used for pulpotomies, has a high level of success partly because it is a fixative that is capable of controlling an inflamed pulp; thus, not requiring an accurate diagnosis of the physiological, histological or pathological status of the pulp. Due to its longstanding acceptance as a clinically effective pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth, formocresol is currently the standard by which other medicaments are compared. |
||